Trustees

Trustees

Trustees—appointment of trustees

There are various ways in which a trustee may be appointed. Trustees will usually be appointed by the instrument that brings the trust into existence. The trust instrument should also seek to make provision for any subsequent appointments of new trustees that may be necessary during the existence of the trust.

Trustees may also be appointed by the court and there are occasions when either the settlor or the beneficiaries may have a role in the appointment of new trustees.

See Practice Note: Trustees—appointment of trustees.

Trustees—retirement of trustees

In principle, the office of trustee is lifelong. Nevertheless, a trustee may retire in a number of ways:

•
by taking advantage of any provision in the trust instrument
•
if someone can be found to replace them, under the provisions of section 36 of the Trustee Act 1925 (TA 1925)
•
under the statutory power in TA 1925, s 39
•
by the beneficiaries’ written direction under section 19 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996)
•
with the beneficiaries’ consent
•
by court order under TA

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

Choice of location for brain-stem death testing is a best interests decision (NHS Trust v DT)

Private client analysis: The Court of Protection held that the location of brain stem death testing must be determined according to the patient’s best interests under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Where a viable option exists for testing abroad, treating doctors must consider evidence of the patient’s wishes, cultural connections and religious beliefs. The court authorised transfer to Country W for testing despite medical risks, given compelling evidence of the patient’s connection there. While narrow in application due to the requirement for private funding, the judgment provides guidance on balancing clinical considerations against cultural and religious factors in determining testing location. Practical implications written by Victoria Butler-Cole KC of 39 Essex Chambers.

Private Client weekly highlights—23 October 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) amendments to the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 which come into force on 3 November 2025; (2) the Office of the Public Guardian publishes guidance on investigatory limits and alternative remedies; (3) analysis of the High Court decision in SKAT v Solo Capital Partners, which confirms the importance of factual evidence when establishing claims for misrepresentation; (4) the Scottish government publishes commentary on Assisted Dying Bill amendment; and (5) the signing of a new tax treaty between the UK and Portugal.

Question of the week: What are the tax implications of parents selling their main residence at an undervalue to their son?

This Q&A considers the tax implications of parents selling their main residence at an undervalue to their son.

FTT expresses preference for Martland over Medpro in late appeal decision (Lands Luo Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Lands Luo Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) granted permission for a late appeal against refusal of a VAT repayment claim. Late appeals are common, but this one is interesting because of the recent uncertainty arising from the Upper Tribunal’s (UT) decision in Medpro and, perhaps relatedly, because the FTT panel in this case included the Senior President of Tribunals.