Trustees

Trustees—appointment of trustees

There are various ways in which a trustee may be appointed. Trustees will usually be appointed by the instrument that brings the trust into existence. The trust instrument should also seek to make provision for any subsequent appointments of new trustees that may be necessary during the existence of the trust.

Trustees may also be appointed by the court and there are occasions when either the settlor or the beneficiaries may have a role in the appointment of new trustees.

See Practice Note: Trustees—appointment of trustees.

Trustees—retirement of trustees

In principle, the office of trustee is lifelong. Nevertheless, a trustee may retire in a number of ways:

  1. by taking advantage of any provision in the trust instrument

  2. if someone can be found to replace them, under the provisions of section 36 of the Trustee Act 1925 (TA 1925)

  3. under the statutory power in TA 1925, s 39

  4. by the beneficiaries’ written direction under section 19 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996)

  5. with the beneficiaries’ consent

  6. by court order under TA

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at section 75A FA 2003 applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents