Tax implications of marriage/civil partnership

Tax implications of entering into a marriage or civil partnership

Spouses and civil partners are taxed independently on their own income, earned and unearned, and any gains. Exceptions to the general principles apply to couples entitled to the married couple’s tax reduction for those born before 6 April 1935, individuals in receipt of child benefit where they or their spouse or civil partner have an income above £60,000 and couples entitled to transfer 10% of unused personal allowance from the lower to the higher income spouse (provided they are not a higher rate taxpayer). Also if an individual benefits from trust assets settled themselves or by their spouse or civil partner, this may mean that the trust is classed as ‘settlor interested’. In these cases the tax charge or relief may affect the tax affairs of both spouses or civil partners.

Income from assets where the legal title is in joint names are deemed for tax purposes to belong to the parties equally (with certain exceptions) regardless of whether that is the case. Where, in reality, the asset is owned beneficially in unequal shares, spouses or

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

All in? Court confirms when a settlement is 'made' for the purposes of excluded property (Accuro Trust (Switzerland) SA v The Commissioners for HMRC)

Private Client analysis: This case considered the meaning of 'relevant property' under the settlements regime of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 (IHTA 1984) and, in particular, the time at which this definition is to be tested. The question arose as to whether the trustees of an offshore trust established by a non-UK domiciled settlor were subject to the UK settlements regime in respect of property added to the trust after the settlor became deemed domiciled in the UK, or whether they were exempt from such charges as the trust consisted solely of excluded property. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that whether trust property is excluded property is based on the status of the trust at the time that it was established, not at the time that the property in question was added to the settlement. As a result, the trust in this case did consist solely of excluded property and no inheritance tax (IHT) charges arose as a result of either the ten-year anniversary or capital distributions. The FTT was also asked to consider whether their jurisdiction was appellate, or supervisory only. The FTT held that, while their jurisdiction was supervisory, the questions raised by the trustees were relevant in establishing whether HMRC had acted reasonably and that the outcome (ie that the paid IHT should be refunded and that no further IHT was due) would be the same in either case. Written by Katherine Willmott, senior associate solicitor at Foot Anstey LLP.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents