Trusts and divorce

Trusts and divorce

If a party to a marriage/civil partnership is a beneficiary under a trust and entitled to receive income or capital from it, that income or capital may be regarded as a financial resource of that party and be taken into account by the court. The court's approach will depend on the type of trust in question and the reasons for which it was set up. The court's ability to consider trusts assets as a resource of a party arises from the section 25(2)(a) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) and paragraph 21(2)(a) of Schedule 5 Part 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004). A trust may also be varied if it is a nuptial settlement. In addition, there may be trusts or property law considerations within family proceedings.

There are three main methods of approaching trusts on divorce/dissolution:

•
treating trust assets as a resource available to one of the parties and thus available for distribution by the court—see Practice Note: Introduction to trusts within financial proceedings—Trusts as a financial resource
•
variation of nuptial settlements under MCA 1973, s 24(1)(c)

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

Testamentary capacity, undue influence, and a missing Will (Burgess v Whittle)

Private Client: This case addresses key issues in probate disputes concerning testamentary capacity, undue influence, and lost Wills. The High Court upheld a 2014 Will that excluded one of the deceased's children, despite challenges regarding capacity, knowledge and approval, and undue influence. The court reaffirmed three significant principles: (1) merely having a condition affecting capacity is insufficient to invalidate a Will - evidence must demonstrate lack of capacity at execution; (2) undue influence claims require proper particularisation and strong evidential basis, particularly when alleged against non-benefiting professionals; and (3) probate can be granted without the original Will if evidence shows it existed at death but was subsequently lost. The judgment also emphasises that elderly or unwell testators can make valid Wills, provided they meet the Banks v Goodfellow test. Practical implications written by Oliver Wooding of St John's Chambers.

OPG publishes guidance on complaints procedure and feedback processes

The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) has published guidance outlining its complaints procedure and feedback processes. The guidance sets out a ten working day timeframe for responses, with extensions permitted for complex investigations. It clarifies that the OPG handles complaints relating to its supervisory services but cannot consider matters involving decisions or processes of the Court of Protection or the High Court, as these fall outside its remit. Complaints regarding legal advice or services are also excluded and should instead be directed to the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The procedure establishes a two-tier escalation process, requiring initial complaints to be addressed before referral to the OPG's chief executive, with final recourse available through the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman via MP referral.

OPG publishes guidance on accessing LPA service

The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) has published comprehensive guidance on accessing the ‘Use a Lasting Power of Attorney’ (Use an LPA) service. This free online service, available to users in England and Wales, enables donors and attorneys to view LPAs electronically rather than relying solely on registered paper versions.

OPG adds 2024–25 annual report to published reports collection

The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) has updated its annual reports collection to include the annual report and accounts for 2024–25. Designated HC 1078 and covering the period from 1 April 2024–31 March 2025, the report was laid before Parliament on 17 July 2025 in compliance with legislative requirements and details OPG's funding sources and expenditure.