Fundraising

Charity fundraising—self and statutory regulation

The Charity Commission are not involved to a great extent in the regulation of charity fundraising. In the main, this has been left to self-regulation and statutory regulation. So far as self-regulation is concerned, this takes the form of trustees ensuring that their charity adopts best practice and avoids poor practice. In the pursuit of this, they can find help from the Chartered Institute of Fundraising and the Fundraising Regulator.

The most important area of statutory control concerns house-to-house collections which are the staple diet of many charities. This is regulated by the House to House Collections Act 1939 and the statutory instruments of the House to House Collections Regulations, SI 1947/2662 and Charities (Church of England) Regulations, SI 1963/1062. The regulation is mostly in the hands of local authorities who issue permits for such collections. They differ from street collections which are subject to a different regime and which, in practice, involve static appeals.

Many charities employ professional fundraisers to collect money or property on their behalf or commercial participators such as advertising companies to assist in public awareness. These

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at section 75A FA 2003 applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents