Fundraising

Fundraising

Charity fundraising—self and statutory regulation

The Charity Commission are not involved to a great extent in the regulation of charity fundraising. In the main, this has been left to self-regulation and statutory regulation. So far as self-regulation is concerned, this takes the form of trustees ensuring that their charity adopts best practice and avoids poor practice. In the pursuit of this, they can find help from the Institute of Fundraising and the Fundraising Standards Board.

The most important area of statutory control concerns house-to-house collections which are the staple diet of many charities. This is regulated by the House to House Collections Act 1939 and two regulatory SIs from 1947 and 1963. The regulation is mostly in the hands of local authorities who issue permits for such collections. They differ from street collections which are subject to a different regime and which, in practice, involve static appeals.

Many charities employ professional fundraisers to collect money or property on their behalf or commercial participators such as advertising companies to assist in public awareness. These persons are also regulated.

See Practice Note: Charity fundraising self and statutory regulation.

Charitable

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

CTJ announces non-contentious probate rules working group membership

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published details of the working group reviewing the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987, SI 1987/2024. The group, chaired by Sir Alastair Norris, includes representatives from His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and legal practitioners from the Bar, private client solicitors and legal executives. The review, which runs until 31 July 2025, brings together expertise from across the probate sector, including a chief master, district probate registrar, and specialists in contentious probate and trust law.

Art under scrutiny—the Ojiri case and its implications for AML obligations

Private Client analysis: Amanda Gray, partner and Katie Mackenzie, trainee solicitor, Art Law at Mishcon de Reya LLP discuss the recent prosecution of an art dealer for offences under the Terrorism Act 2000 and its implications for art market professionals.

Private Client weekly highlights—3 July 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client weekly highlights includes: (1) the case of David Peace, in which the High Court confirmed that the beneficiaries could agree to waive the forfeiture rule following Mr Peace’s assisted death; (2) the Court of Protection case of Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council v A, in which the court found that an elderly dementia sufferer was moved from Spain to Wales unlawfully and continued to have habitual residence in Spain; (3) Mudan v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, in which the Court of Appeal confirmed the FTT and UT decisions that property requiring significant renovations should still be treated as residential property for SDLT purposes; (4) Khatun v Hasan, in which the Chancery Division held that the defendants failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that the disputed Will was genuine; and (5) Haworth v HMRC, in which The Court of Appeal dismissed the taxpayers’ appeal and upheld the decisions of the FTT and UT that the place of effective management of certain family trusts was in the UK, and not Mauritius.

ICAEW reports HMCTS advances in probate processing and digital enhancements

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) reports on HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) probate service developments as of June 2025. HMCTS data for April 2025 indicates that although caseloads have stabilised at approximately 35,000 cases as of 31 May 2025, digital grant applications are now processed in 4.9 weeks compared to 12.3 weeks for paper applications. Service enhancements include improved case ownership by support officers, the continued availability of surgery appointments for complex cases, streamlined phone support through merged lines, and targeted improvements in the scanning process to reduce document errors. The update also notes recent Law Commission recommendations from May 2025 proposing the acceptance of electronic Wills and signatures—however, implementation remains the responsibility of the Ministry of Justice policy teams, and HMCTS is monitoring these potential changes.