When is Syers relief appropriate on dissolution of a general partnership? (Cobden v Cobden [2025])
Private Client analysis: The case concerned an agricultural general partnership. There was no written partnership agreement, so the partnership was governed by the Partnership Act 1890 (PA 1890). Under Section 39 of the Act, and in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, the court would typically order the assets of a dissolved partnership to be sold, enabling settlement of the partnership’s debts and liabilities and division of any remaining residue among the partners in the proportions in which profits are divisible. However, the court held in this case that an equity existed (akin to a proprietary estoppel) which made an open market sale unfair. It was therefore justified in making an order in accordance with Syers v Syers (1876) 1 App. Cas. 174, allowing the partner with the equity to buy out the other’s interest. The case is significant as it establishes when a Syers Order may be made to prevent unfairness or injustice. Written by Rose Westwood, associate, at Foot Anstey LLP.