Charity land

In many cases the most valuable asset that a charity has is land. They may own it for the purposes of a trading base or an income source or they may rent it for the purposes of a retail presence. Whatever the reason there are relatively strict rules as to its acquisition and disposal.

Buying land for a charity

If a charity is proposing to buy property, there are a number of issues that the charity trustees must consider. In particular, the charity must have the power to buy land, whether that land is functional premises, administrative or trading premises or investment property.

Ordinarily, the charity’s governing document will contain an express power for it to buy property. However, an express power is often limited to the acquisition of functional property only and any sort of ‘sweep-up’ provision in the governing document should not be relied on as conferring power to buy other types of property. However, where there is no express power to buy a particular class of property, the charity trustees of an unincorporated charity can amend the governing document to include such a power.

A statutory

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at section 75A FA 2003 applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents