Charities—education

Charities—education

Introduction to academy schools

An academy is a school for pupils of compulsory school age (with or without the addition of a subsidiary nursery or sixth-form). Academies are state schools funded almost wholly through a funding agreement made between the sponsors or promoters of the academy and the Department for Education (DfE). In the academic year 2010–2011 there were just over 400 academies in England and by 2024 there were over 10,000.

There are no academies in Wales. Although section 18(1) of the Academies Act 2010 (AcA 2010) does apply in Wales, the provisions for the creation and funding of new academies apply only in England.

Academies were founded originally under section 482 of the Education Act 1996 (EA 1996) and are now regulated by AcA 2010. Academies are technically defined as independent schools, but this independence is from their local authority, not from the state. Their funding comes from the Secretary of State and is regulated by a funding agreement negotiated with the DfE or the Education Funding Agency (EFA) when the academy was founded.

See Practice Note: Introduction to academy schools.

Free

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

HMRC Guidance: Qualifying income for Making Tax Digital for Income Tax

HMRC has updated its guidance on qualifying income for partnership profits.

Executor misconduct: injunctions, removal and indemnities (Re Organ; House v Helme)

Private Client analysis: The court made an order restraining two executors (including a solicitor) from dissipating the Estate’s assets pending the determination of the claim for their removal. It then appointed a trust corporation in their place, ordered they pay the beneficiaries’ costs assessed on the indemnity basis and found the executors had no right of indemnity in respect of the costs of the proceedings. Sitting as a High Court Judge, His Honor Judge Matthews re-affirmed the principles governing removal; addressed the interesting question of whether an executor has a duty to inform beneficiaries of their interest; and gave guidance on the often hard fought issue of indemnities in respect of the costs of removal applications. Written by Toby Bishop, barrister at 5 Stone Buildings (counsel for the claimants).

Changes to AEOI FATCA and CRS registration for certain trusts

Private Client analysis: The International Tax Compliance (Amendment) Regulations 2025, SI 2025/740 updated the UK’s rules for Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) under the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), introducing mandatory HMRC registration for certain financial institutions (as well as expanding self-certification and compliance obligations). Existing in-scope financial institutions had to register with HMRC by 31 December 2025, with the deadline for registration for the 2026 reporting year onwards set for 31 January following the first calendar year in which the financial institution comes within scope. With certain trusts caught by the new registration requirement, trustees and their advisers should consider whether their trusts must now register with HMRC. Written by Elinor Boote, senior associate, Caroline Belam, knowledge development lawyer and Ciara John, knowledge paralegal at Charles Russell Speechlys.

Private Client weekly highlights—29 January 2026

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) Dorant v Dorant, which provides guidance on the court’s approach to kin inquiries, genealogy and forensic DNA testing; (2) HMRC v MedPro Healthcare, in which the Court of Appeal confirmed the Martland approach to late appeals; (3) updates to Companies House transition plan for implementing ECCTA 2023 provisions; (4) the House of Lords report warning that IHT changes on pensions remain unworkable without further reform; (5) Charity Commissioner for England and Wales v The Information Commissioner, in which the UKFTT allowed an appeal by the Charity Commission to withhold disclosure of charity trustee name dispensations; and (6) Conway v Conway and another, where the court held that section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 barred specific performance of an oral contract for the sale of land.