Planning statutory review and appeals

Challenging planning decisions

Planning decisions and actions by local planning authorities (LPAs), the Secretary of State and other public bodies can be challenged in the courts if the decision taken was unlawful.

In principle, a planning decision can be challenged through an application to the High Court for judicial review, under Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR), SI 1998/3132, Pt 54. See Practice Note: Planning judicial review.

Statutory planning review

There are instances where the relevant statutory regime governing a particular decision or action expressly prevents the decision or action from being challenged in court, including via judicial review, other than by way of a statutory application. In other words, the relevant legislation will expressly state that a particular action or decision cannot be challenged except in accordance with a specific statutory provision. Such challenges are known as statutory reviews or statutory challenges. In a planning context, statutory planning review comprises:

•
applications under section 287 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) in respect of the validity of simplified planning zone schemes and certain highway and other orders

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Planning News

Planning weekly highlights—1 May 2025

This week's edition of Planning weekly highlights includes: a Court of Appeal decision on appropriate assessments and a planning committee’s failure to consider relevant information; a consultation on revised energy NPSs; the Chief Planer’s newsletter and Planning and Infrastructure Bill amendments to expedite infrastructure delivery.

RIBA outlines recommendations for Planning and Infrastructure Bill amendments

The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) has published its recommendations for the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, introduced in March 2025. The Bill aims to deliver 1.5 million homes in England and expedite 150 major infrastructure planning decisions through reforms to the planning system. RIBA has proposed three key amendments: requiring design vision components in Spatial Development Strategies, increasing local planning department resources, and implementing mandatory training for planning committee members. The organisation has specifically called for a new clause in Chapter 2 of the Bill mandating design vision requirements for spatial development strategies. The Bill is currently progressing through Parliament with government priority status.

Chief Planner's planning update newsletter April 2025

The Chief Planner, Joanna Averley, has published a planning update newsletter for April 2025, written for the chief planning officers at local planning authorities (LPAs). The newsletter contains details concerning the announcement of a £1.2m PropTech Innovation Challenge to accelerate housing delivery which will fund up to 12 PropTech projects while developing digital solutions to support the delivery of 1.5m new homes, Historic England’s revised guidance for roof thatching has been issued to clarify heritage conservation issues around thatch material, addressing concerns after poor harvests and, Natural England’s updated framework concerning protected species which now allows LPAs to make decisions without a consultation in most instances (feedback is welcomed on these changes). Additional content includes various policy and guidance updates, research initiatives, webinars on coastal change, and fact sheets to support nature in development.

Appropriate assessments and planning committee’s failure to consider relevant information (R (on the application of Dr Rosalind Bradbury) v Brecon Beacons National Park Authority)

Planning analysis: In Bradbury v Brecon Beacons National Park Authority, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a decision to grant planning permission for two developments, despite the planning committee’s failure to consider relevant information (specifically, the absence of appropriate assessments and the potential impact of the proposed development on the integrity of the River Wye Special Area of Conservation) on the basis that it was highly likely the committee would have reached the same decision even if this breach had not occurred. (R (on the application of Dr Rosalind Bradbury) v Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Bannau Brycheiniog (Brecon Beacons National Park Authority)). Written by Martha Grekos, barrister at Martha Grekos Legal Consultancy.