Judicial review of planning decisions

Scope of judicial review in planning matters

A claim for judicial review is defined in the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR), SI 1998/3132, Pt 54 as a claim to review the lawfulness of an enactment, or a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function. Decisions, actions or failures to take action in relation to the exercise of a public function are in principle subject to judicial review.

This encompasses many planning decisions and actions by local planning authorities (LPAs) and the Secretary of State which can be challenged in the courts by way of judicial review if the decision taken was unlawful, including but not limited to:

•
decisions by LPAs granting planning permission, reserved matters approvals, approvals of conditions and prior approval under permitted development rights
•
decisions by LPAs to modify or discharge a planning obligation pursuant to applications under section 106A or 106B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990)
•
decisions relating to development consent orders and national policy statements under the Planning Act 2008 (PA 2008)

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Planning News

Viability in planning—back in the spotlight

Planning analysis: A sequence of recent decisions have highlighted the current thinking around viability, and these are a timely reminder to practitioners of the vital importance of viability in the planning process. Matthew Tucker of Burges Salmon considers the matter.

High Court challenge to a Compulsory Purchase Order (Saravanamuthu v Secretary of State for Communities, Housing and Local Government)

Planning analysis: The claimant challenged the validity of the London Borough of Newham (James Riley Point) Compulsory Purchase Order 2023, inter alia, on the basis of the rationality and lawfulness of the inspector’s approach to assessing the financial viability of the scheme. When an acquiring authority seeks to use powers under section 226 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) for a compulsory purchase order, government guidance is that the decision-maker will need to consider ’the potential financial viability of the scheme’. The case explores how that element of the guidance applies to authority-led schemes, in particular, where the scheme is regarded by the council as a ’loss leader’ (essentially to encourage wider regeneration in the locality), as here. Written by Mark Westmoreland Smith, King’s Counsel at Francis Taylor Building.

MHCLG launches consultation on measures to streamline infrastructure planning process

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has launched a consultation on proposed changes to guidance, public sector services and secondary legislation aimed at streamlining the infrastructure planning process for nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs). Key proposals include: (1) new guidance on consultation and engagement following the removal of statutory pre-application consultation requirements under the Planning and Infrastructure Bill; (2) guidance to support the acceptance stage of applications; (3) guidance for public bodies on their role during examinations; (4) regulatory changes related to the examination of applications, including compulsory acquisition; (5) reforms and improvements to pre-application services provided by the Planning Inspectorate and the fast-track process; and (6) measures to support pre-application services through effective resourcing of statutory bodies, among other proposals. The consultation also seeks views on removing statutory pre-application requirements for onshore wind projects under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) guidance.

RIBA secures design quality amendment to Planning and Infrastructure Bill

The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) has secured an amendment to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill that would require Spatial Development Strategies to include design visions for future developments. The amendment, tabled by the Liberal Democrat Lords Housing Spokesperson, Baroness Thornhill MBE, will be debated in Parliament in September 2025. It seeks to ensure that design quality is prioritised and embedded within strategic planning processes.