Accidents abroad

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Practical tips

Various issues arise in relation to accidents abroad including:

  1. •

    can the claim be brought in England and Wales

  2. •

    do the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim

  3. •

    how can service of proceedings be carried out abroad

  4. •

    which country’s laws will govern the various issues in the case and how will this be determined

The first step is to determine whether the incident relates to a package holiday which is covered by the Package Travel Regulations. For the majority of package holiday claims, it is usually possible to bring a claim against a travel operator domiciled in England and Wales. However, jurisdiction is likely to be an issue in relation to non-tour operator claims and road traffic accidents.

For practical tips on dealing with cases involving claimants injured abroad, see Practice Note: Accidents abroad—a practical guide.

It is important to appreciate that special rules apply under international conventions in claims arising from international travel by train, air or sea. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Accidents arising from air travel and Accidents at sea.

Jurisdiction

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

HMCTS announces mandation of the OCMC pilot and automatic referral to mediation for non-injury RTA claims

Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has announced that from 28 July 2025, the Online Civil Money Claims (OCMC) pilot in CPR PD 51R will be mandatory for eligible claims where the parties are represented. This is provided for in the 187th Practice Direction update to the CPR. In addition, this update includes the introduction of a one-year pilot for automatic referral to mediation for non-personal injury road traffic accident (RTA) claims issued through the OCMC service. HMCTS will evaluate the pilot and conduct a public consultation to inform future policy decisions regarding mandatory mediation.

Event to mark the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee and to launch the work of the Online Procedure Rule Committee

On 16 July 2025, the Master of the Rolls and Lord Justice Birss gave speeches at an event hosted by the Ministry of Justice and The Law Society. The event marked the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) and launched the public engagement work carried out by the Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC).

When employment duties extend beyond the clock—employer liability and Sanderson orders (Pashamov v Taylor & another)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: A farm worker suffered serious injuries when he was struck by a car when crossing the road. The claimant had been travelling back from the field to his lodgings on a company bus and had left the bus to tell employees on the other side of the road to get on. The judge dismissed the claim against the car driver, but the worker succeeded against his employer. The judge held that he had been engaged in activities incidental to his employment. The judge made a Sanderson order against the employer. It was ordered to pay both the driver’s costs and the costs the claimant had incurred against the driver in turn. Written by David Juckes, barrister at Hailsham Chambers.

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—24 July 2025

This week’s edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2025, SI 2025/893, which update procedures for the CE-File electronic case system. The NHS published its annual report and accounts for 2024/25, revealing that 83% of clinical compensation claims were resolved out of court, with over 11,000 settled via alternative dispute resolution. We take a look at silicosis claims, focusing on the risks of prolonged exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and employer liability. We also feature a recent High Court decision that found the claimant was responsible for his own injuries during a snowmobile accident. In addition, we have our usual round-up of other news, cases, webinars and New Law Journal articles of interest.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Can a claimant claim for loss of enjoyment of a holiday or activity as a result of an injury sustained in

Can a claimant claim for loss of enjoyment of a holiday or activity as a result of an injury sustained in a road traffic accident. If so, how is this loss quantified?Claims can be raised for loss of enjoyment of a holiday or an activity and falls under the category of a non-pecuniary loss, as the

Defences to a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987

Defences to a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987Limitation or exclusion of liability for defective products in any contract term, notice or other provision is prohibited.Defences to a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) fall into four main categories:•the injured person

False imprisonment

False imprisonmentLiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will usually be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of

Claims against the police

Claims against the policeIntroductionThe police force is a pure public authority (ie performs only public functions). Therefore, claims can be brought against it under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and of misfeasance in public office. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Personal injury
Can a claimant claim for loss of enjoyment of a holiday or activity as a result of an injury sustained in

Can a claimant claim for loss of enjoyment of a holiday or activity as a result of an injury sustained in

Can a claimant claim for loss of enjoyment of a holiday or activity as a result of an injury sustained in a road traffic accident. If so, how is this loss quantified?Claims can be raised for loss of enjoyment of a holiday or an activity and falls under the category of a non-pecuniary loss, as the

Defences to a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987

Defences to a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987

Defences to a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987Limitation or exclusion of liability for defective products in any contract term, notice or other provision is prohibited.Defences to a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) fall into four main categories:•the injured person

False imprisonment

False imprisonment

False imprisonmentLiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will usually be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of

Claims against the police

Claims against the police

Claims against the policeIntroductionThe police force is a pure public authority (ie performs only public functions). Therefore, claims can be brought against it under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and of misfeasance in public office. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Personal injury