Personal injury protocols

Pre-action protocols

There are a number of pre-action protocols relating to specific types of personal injury claims which set out the conduct expected of the parties and the steps the court would normally expect parties to take before commencing proceedings. You should follow the protocol that most closely relates to the subject matter of the dispute. If there is no protocol for the type of dispute you are dealing with, you should refer to the Practice Direction Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols (the Practice Direction).

The limitation period is not suspended while parties comply with a pre-action protocol or the Practice Direction. If the limitation period is about to expire, protective proceedings should be issued and either party should then apply to stay the action in order to allow time for compliance with the relevant pre-action protocol or the Practice Direction.

For more detail, see Practice Note: The pre-action protocols and when they apply.

Non-compliance with pre-action provisions

Failure to comply with any of the specific pre-action protocols or the Practice Direction could result in the court applying sanctions, including as to costs, once a claim has been

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

The Law Society’s AI strategy and response to government

The Law Society has responded to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology’s call for evidence on the AI Growth Lab, stressing the need for a proportionate regulatory approach that supports innovation while maintaining professional standards. In a press release dated 6 January 2026, the sector’s widespread willingness to embrace lawtech was highlighted, with two-thirds of lawyers said to ‘already use AI tools in their work’, alongside an ongoing uncertainty as to the risks and ‘exact requirements for data security, oversight and liability’. Separately, The Law Society’s ‘Introduction to lawtech’ guide published on 29 December 2025 observed that client demand for ‘greater efficiency, transparency and cost control, especially in corporate legal services’ has been a key driver for AI usage, with larger firms leading adoption and medium-sized firms catching up. The Law Society says it will continue to work with the government to ensure AI benefits both firms and clients, with its strategy focused on the following three key outcomes: i) innovation in legal service delivery; ii) an effective AI regulatory landscape, influenced by the legal sector; and iii) integrity through responsible AI use, supporting the rule of law and access to justice. Links to consultation responses and downloadable submissions on a range of AI-related issues, including data processing, ransomware resilience and the use of AI outputs in criminal proceedings (among others), are included on The Law Society’s ‘AI and lawtech: government policy and regulation’ page (updated on 18 December 2025), which also invites members to share their views and identify any gaps in support or guidance.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :

Popular documents