NEST

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

Using NEST for auto-enrolment

NEST is a pension scheme established under the authority of the Secretary of State under s 67 of the Pensions Act 2008 (PenA 2008) and the National Employment Savings Trust Order 2010, SI 2010/917 as a vehicle that employers may utilise in order to meet their auto-enrolment obligations. NEST was created specifically to ensure that smaller companies and low-to-moderate earners have access to quality pension provision.

NEST is a registered pension scheme for the purposes of s 153 of the Finance Act 2004, providing benefits on a defined contributions basis, and must accept any employer wishing to join in order to meet its employer duties under PenA 2008 (known as its 'public service obligation'). Subject to certain conditions, self-employed persons and persons claiming pension entitlements under divorce settlements may also join the scheme. In addition, employers may request to join in advance of their employer duties applying.

An employer may prefer to use NEST to meet their auto-enrolment obligations:

  1. •

    to reduce the administrative burden (as an employer would generally just need to enrol employees and pay contributions)

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

Court approves settlement in complex pensions matter (Places for People Pension Trustee Ltd v Places for People Group Ltd)

Pensions analysis: On 19 December 2025, following a two-day hearing, Richards J approved a settlement concerning various validity and section 37 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 (PSA 1993) issues agreed between the parties and granted rectification of several deeds of amendment in respect of the Places for People Group Retirement Benefit Scheme, a defined benefit, contracted-out occupational pension scheme. The case is a salient reminder of the need for intricate orders settling complex cases and the additional requirements flowing from the fact that the court will only approve a settlement, where one or other of the parties is acting in a representative capacity, if it is satisfied that the settlement is for the benefit of all the represented persons. Written by Andrew Spink KC, David E Grant KC, Saul Margo and Joshua Cainer.

Joint regulatory VFM proposals aim to improve transparency and comparability in DC pension schemes

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have published a joint regulatory consultation and consultation response in CP26/1 setting out how a new value for money (VFM) framework could operate consistently across defined contribution (DC) workplace pensions. The proposals are designed to move the industry away from narrow cost-based assessments and towards a more holistic and comparable evaluation of the value delivered to pension savers in both trust-based and contract-based schemes. The proposed framework is intended to enable trustees, providers and governance bodies to assess the long-term performance of DC pension schemes for savers, improving transparency and competition by making it clearer which schemes deliver good value, and which do not, and supporting better retirement outcomes. The FCA has also published its response to feedback on its earlier consultation CP24/16 and the new consultation on revised detailed rules and guidance for contract-based schemes are to be implemented through the FCA Handbook. For trust-based schemes, where the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will legislate for the framework through the Pension Schemes Bill currently before Parliament, CP26/1 serves as discussion paper intended to gather timely input from the industry to help shape the detailed regulations and guidance that DWP and TPR are set to develop. The deadline for responding to consultation CP26/1 is 8 March 2026.

Pensions weekly highlights—8 January 2026

This week’s edition of Pensions weekly highlights includes a review of key news stories, as well as dates for your diary and trackers.

PDP issues call for feedback on industry working group proposals to shape delivery of private sector dashboards

The Pensions Dashboards Programme (PDP) has launched a call for feedback on proposals to adapt the industry participant approach used for connecting pension providers and schemes to the Central Digital Architecture (CDA) to support the delivery of private sector dashboards (PSDs). In particular, the PDP is seeking views on whether a collaborative model, involving a defined group of industry participants working closely with the PDP team, can help shape the processes, standards and support needed for dashboards developed and operated in the private sector. The PDP also envisages a PSD working group that goes beyond pure connection issues and supports the iteration of standards, development of guidance, refinement of end-to-end processes and testing of full dashboard journeys, including user experience. Responses to the request for feedback questions to help shape how this engagement model is taken forward are sought by 10 February 2026.

View Pensions by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of
Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of