Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Article summary
Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: In the recent case of Hellard and another v Graiseley Investments Ltd and others, the High Court excluded the applicant’s witness statement of commentary and comments and reminded liquidators they must follow the CPR as much as any other litigant. Dan Bunting, barrister at Dr. Johnson’s Building, comments on the issues raised in this case.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial