Home / Property / Leasing property / Leasehold enfranchisement

Legal News

Right to manage claim notice valid despite failure to serve copy on qualifying tenants

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 14 March 2012
Published by a LexisNexis Property expert

Article summary

A right to manage claim notice was not invalidated by the RTM company’s failure to serve a copy on qualifying tenants. The notice was valid (and had not been withdrawn). A subsequent notice was invalid as the first notice continued in force.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

4 News
View More
8 Q&As
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 News
View More
8 Q&As
View More

Popular documents

Concurrent leases

Concurrent leasesThis Practice Note explains:•what a concurrent lease is•when it is commonly used•who can enforce (and benefit from) the covenants in the existing lease(s), and•key differences between a concurrent lease and a headlease out of which underleases are grantedIt also looks at key terms

Reversionary leases

Reversionary leasesReversionary leases (or future leases) are granted to take effect in possession at a future date. This Practice Note looks at:•when a reversionary lease is used (including to avoid surrender and regrant)•statutory rules relating to the grant of reversionary leases (including in

Contractual option to renew a lease

Contractual option to renew a leaseA contractual option to take a lease for a further term is a ‘call’ option. It confers a unilateral right on the tenant to call for a renewal lease. There is no obligation on the tenant to exercise this right, but if the tenant does so the landlord must then

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a