Table of contents
- Administration
- Automatic crystallisation clauses and effect on appointment of administrators (Saw (SW) 2010 Ltd and another v Wilson)
- Evidence and evidence gathering
- Re Lemos; Leeds and another (in their capacity as the joint trustees in bankruptcy of the estate of Lemos) v Lemos and others
- Statutory demands
- Non-receipt of statutory demands and bankruptcy petitions can still be good service (Re Emmanuel)
- Order of payments
- Ranking and redemption in investment funds (Pearson v Primeo Fund (Cayman Islands))
- Cross-border co-operation
- INSOL protocol aims to reduce costs and administration by enabling recognition across borders
More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
Article summary
This month’s edition of Restructuring & Insolvency highlights includes case reports considering whether the holder of a second ranking floating charge was entitled to appoint administrators, and whether statutory demands and bankruptcy petitions can be served even where not received by the debtor, together with a round up of other restructuring and insolvency news.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial