Cross-class cramdown successfully used against nine dissenting classes(Re Poundland Ltd)
Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The High Court sanctioned Poundland Ltd's restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), applying its cross-class cram down powers despite significant landlord dissent. Sir Alastair Norris held that the statutory 'no worse off' and 'economic interest' tests were satisfied and that the plan's benefit allocation was fair and commercially justified. The judgment reinforces recent appellate guidance (including Adler, Thames Water, and Petrofac) on fairness, differential treatment, and creditor engagement, confirming that courts will prioritise genuine rescue efforts over objections driven by extraneous or self-interested motives. Practical implications written by Elaine Nolan, partner of Keystone Law.