Legal News

PO determination on overpayment defence and approach to compensation for distress and inconvenience (Belk PO-372 and PO-4244)

Published on: 30 November 2015

Table of contents

  • Original news
  • Summary
  • What were the facts?
  • What was the Pensions Ombudsman’s determination?
  • Overpayment
  • AVC Fund
  • Improper financial advice
  • Distress and inconvenience
  • What was the impact of this determination?

Article summary

Pensions analysis: In Belk, the Pensions Ombudsman failed to uphold complaints brought by a pension scheme member against the scheme trustees and administrators concerning a failure to pay an AVC fund and an overpayment of pension. Wyn Derbyshire of gunnercooke LLP looks at the decision.

Popular documents