DC governance

Rise of DC governance

With the increasing burden that defined benefit pension schemes have had on employers, and the introduction of the catalyst that is automatic enrolment, a dramatic rise in defined contribution (DC) pension schemes was somewhat inevitable. Now that DC is firmly under the spotlight, concerns have emerged about the need to achieve good member outcomes across DC workplace pension scheme (which encompass both occupational and personal pension schemes).

This has led to the introduction of various governance measures by the Department for Work and Pensions and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for DC workplace pension schemes. These measures are broadly described below.

In addition, various measures limit costs and charges, such as bans on member-borne commission arrangements, consultancy charging, and active member discounts, as well as caps on charges for default funds and early exit charges. This helps to ensure value for members. For further information, see Costs and charges—overview.

DC occupational pension schemes

Key governance requirements for DC occupational pension schemes that are relevant schemes (effectively schemes offering money purchase benefits, subject to some exceptions) include mandating the appointment of a chair on trustee boards.

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

Pensions Schemes Bill makes progress at Lords Grand Committee Stage despite strong reservations on LGPS reforms

The House of Lords Grand Committee (Grand Committee) opened its detailed scrutiny of the Pension Schemes Bill on 12 January 2026. Day 1 of the Grand Committee’s examination began on Chapter 1 of the Bill on the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) and in particular Clauses 1 (Asset pool companies) and 2 (Asset management). Ultimately, all amendments debated on 12 January were withdrawn, and Clauses 1 and 2 were agreed without change. However, the debate raised significant cross-party concern about the breadth of ministerial powers, the heavy reliance on delegated legislation, the protection of fiduciary duty and the extent of ministerial influence over pension investment. On 14 January 2026, the Grand Committee continued its focus on the provisions of Chapter 1 of the Pension Schemes Bill when it agreed Clauses 6 (Mergers of funds), 7 (Amendments of 2013 Act relating to scheme regulations) and 8 (Interpretation of Chapter 1). Again, agreement was reached despite extensive debate highlighting concerns over compulsory mergers, funding positions, contribution prudence and employer affordability, surplus management, transparency, and the impact of local government reorganisation. The government peers maintained that existing statutory, actuarial and governance frameworks are sufficient and that further changes should be considered through consultation rather than primary legislation. The Grand Committee is currently scheduled to sit again on 19, 22 and 26 January 2026 when further detailed examination of the Pension Schemes Bill will continue.

View Pensions by content type :

Popular documents