Table of contents
- Original news
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What were the facts?
- What was the issue involved?
- What did court decide?
- What were the unsuccessful arguments?
- AHA 1986—entitlement to rents
- Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925)—entitlement to income
- LRA 2002—owner’s powers
- To what extent is the judgment helpful?
More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
Article summary
Property analysis: A buyer of a property served a notice to quit on an agricultural tenant, but at the time the notice was served, the buyer was not the registered owner of the property. The court held that the notice to quit was invalid as the buyer was not the legal owner of the land when it served the notice.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial