Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Article summary
Family analysis: In a case where the applicant had undergone gender reassignment surgery but had not obtained a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) by the date of the marriage, because same-sex marriage was not legal at the time of the marriage, it was void at its inception and the court did not have the necessary powers to make a declaration that it was a valid marriage. Lyndsey Sambrooks-Wright, barrister at Garden Court Chambers, considers the background to the case and its practical implications.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial