- Survivor’s pensions and same-sex spouses—the final word on pensions inequality? (Walker v Innospec Ltd and others)
- Original news
- What was the background to the case?
- What issues arose for the Supreme Court’s consideration?
- What did the court decide, and why?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area? Are there still any unresolved issues practitioners will need to watch out for?
- What are the implications for practitioners? What will they need to be mindful of when advising in this area?
Pensions analysis: Martin Chamberlain QC and Max Schaefer of Brick Court Chambers consider the Supreme Court’s judgment in Walker v Innospec Ltd and others and why, in schemes like the Innospec pension scheme, trustees and employers can no longer rely on the exemption under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) to restrict the survivors’ benefits of same-sex spouses.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial