Death benefits

Provision of death benefits through registered occupational pension schemes

An important facet of most, if not all, retirement benefit schemes is their ability to provide survivors’ benefits payable in the event of death, as well as benefits in the event of retirement due to old age or ill health. Most registered occupational pension schemes (both defined benefit and money purchase) provide death benefits if a member dies while in active service with the sponsoring employer, during a period of deferment or while in receipt of a pension.

The particular form of death benefits provided by an occupational pension scheme will depend on:

  1. the type of scheme (eg defined benefit or money purchase)

  2. the member’s status at death (ie active, deferred, pensioner), and

  3. what death benefits HMRC permits as an authorised payment. If a death benefit is an unauthorised payment, it will be subject to punitive tax charges

Some of those death benefits (typically lump sums, and possibly spouses’ and dependants’ pensions) may be insured, with the insurance policy or policies being held in the name of the scheme trustee and constituting a scheme asset.

For

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

Pension Schemes Bill: Employer surplus-payment provisions pass Grand Committee scrutiny unchanged

At the third day of Grand Committee on the Pension Schemes Bill on 19 January 2026, the House of Lords undertook an extensive examination of Clauses 9 (Power to modify scheme to allow for payment of surplus to employer) and 10 (Restrictions on exercise of power to pay surplus), with debate focused on a series of amendments that tested how far the new surplus release regime should be constrained in primary legislation. In particular, peers tabled amendments seeking to change the terminology from ‘surplus’ to ‘assets’, to require surplus to be shared with members, to mandate benefit enhancements including inflation protection, to strengthen member notification or consultation (including trade union involvement) in the surplus release process, to constrain the Secretary of State’s regulation-making powers, to embed actuarial and endgame requirements in statute, and to alter insolvency priorities where employers had previously extracted surplus. The government response, delivered principally by Baroness Sherlock, consistently resisted the amendments to prescriptive statutory rules governing the use of surplus or the processes surrounding its release, and instead defended the Bill’s reliance on trustee discretion, fiduciary duties, actuarial certification, and regulatory oversight by the Pensions Regulator.  All amendments were either withdrawn or not moved following government opposition, and Clauses 9 and 10 were agreed without amendment.

View Pensions by content type :

Popular documents