Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- Historical costs in legal services order applications
- Cryptocurrency
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Article summary
Family analysis: In DH v RH (LSPO and MPS Applications), Mr Justice MacDonald considered the correct approach to historical costs in legal services order applications and disclosure issues regarding cryptocurrency assets, as well as an application for maintenance pending suit. David Wilkinson, solicitor at Slater Heelis, examines the issues.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial