First interview

First interview

Initial instructions and conflict of interest checks

Prior to meeting the client or taking instructions, sufficient information should be taken over the telephone or by email to enable a conflict of interest check to be carried out in compliance with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) SRA Standards and Regulations. The check should be against the client, the other party and any relevant third parties. The full names of each person and any other name(s) by which they have been known should be obtained.

It may be helpful for the client to provide in advance of the first meeting a written statement of the parties’ relationship, with details of their financial circumstances where appropriate, perhaps using a questionnaire sent by email. Clients should be asked to bring any relevant documentation, such as:

•
the marriage or registration certificate if civil partners
•
any pre- or post-nuptial agreement
•
any cohabitation agreement, and
•
any relevant deed of trust

Compliance with the requirements of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is essential. The client should be informed in advance of the first meeting of the documentation required. The Law Society guidance

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Law Commission publishes report recommending disabled children's social care law reforms

The Law Commission has published its final report on the legal framework governing social care for disabled children in England. The review was commissioned by the Department for Education following recommendations from the 2022 Independent Review of Children’s Social Care. It sets out recommendations aimed at simplifying the law, improving consistency, aligning it with related legislation and ensuring it better meets the needs of disabled children and their families.

Armstrong v Armstrong (remedy)—satisfying the equity arising from proprietary estoppel, with an alternative award under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

Private Client analysis: Having found that the claimant had established his claims in proprietary estoppel and under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) at trial (Armstrong v Armstrong [2024] EWHC 2989 (Ch)), the court went on to consider the appropriate remedy, aiming to achieve as clean a break as possible between members of the same farming family whose business affairs were closely entwined. The Court also considered the appropriate award under the I(PFD)A 1975 in the alternative, in case the finding of an estoppel should be overturned upon appeal. Written by William Moffett, barrister at Radcliffe Chambers.

MyHMCTS Family Public Law service adds extra categories for Case File View

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has issued a release note in relation to Case File View following feedback that indicated a need for additional folder categories and some adjustments to ensure documents are filed in the correct folders, making them easier to locate and access. To address this, new folders titled ‘Advocate Meeting Minutes’ and ‘Witness Template’ will be added and the respondents section will be restricted and renamed to include folders titled ‘Respondent's Own Statements’ and ‘Respondent's Witness Statements’ (renaming the existing ‘Witness Statements’ subfolder). In addition the ‘Guardians Reports’ folder will be removed to prevent duplication and confusion, as a ‘Guardians Evidence’ folder already exists. The release date is 8 October 2025.

Family Presiding Judge for London issues revised Public Law Practice Note

In a letter dated 30 September 2025, the Family Presiding Judge for London, Mr Justice MacDonald, has issued a revised Public Law Practice Note for London to secure rigorous adherence to the Public Law Outline (PLO). The revisions made to the Practice Note centre on reiterating the test of necessity for both the instruction of expert evidence and the attendance of experts for cross examination at any final hearing. A similar revision is made in respect of controlling the use of intermediaries. Minor changes have also been made with respect to the consequences of default of case management directions. The Practice Note forms part of the wider London Family Justice Strategy. The key objectives of that strategy are to reduce delay in public law proceedings and to deal with the backlog of private law cases, with a view to preparing London for Pathfinder. The Practice Note is designed to maintain rigour in the case management of public law cases. In addition, a programme has been introduced to identify and seek to resolve long running private law cases that are, or can be made, ready for final hearing. The Ministry of Justice has provided funding for additional sitting days for private law and additional courts are sitting at Wandsworth deal with those cases. A pilot project is examining the use of Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) case progression officers.