Legal News

Landlord and tenant service charges (Marlborough Park Services Ltd v Leitner)

Published on: 13 September 2018

Table of contents

  • What are the practical implications of the case?
  • What was the background to this case?
  • What did the UT (Lands Chamber) decide?
  • Payments subject to a default judgment
  • Payments made without protest
  • The alleged ‘admission’ in respect of future service charges
  • Conclusion

Article summary

Property Disputes analysis: Lawrence McDonald, barrister at Exchange Chambers, discusses the Upper Tribunal (UT) (Lands Chamber) decision in Marlborough Park Services Ltd v Leitner, which clarified the circumstances in which the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) (Property Chamber) might not have jurisdiction to consider a leaseholder’s application to determine the reasonableness of service charges.

Popular documents