Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of the case?
- What was the background to this case?
- What did the UT (Lands Chamber) decide?
- Payments subject to a default judgment
- Payments made without protest
- The alleged ‘admission’ in respect of future service charges
- Conclusion
Article summary
Property Disputes analysis: Lawrence McDonald, barrister at Exchange Chambers, discusses the Upper Tribunal (UT) (Lands Chamber) decision in Marlborough Park Services Ltd v Leitner, which clarified the circumstances in which the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) (Property Chamber) might not have jurisdiction to consider a leaseholder’s application to determine the reasonableness of service charges.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial