Article summary
IP analysis: The High Court held that a number of apps offered on Samsung’s app store infringed various trade marks owned by the Swatch group. The judge found that Samsung should be held liable as a primary tortfeasor due to the level of control it exerted over the publishing process, despite the apps in question being created by third-party developers. The judgment provides useful clarification on how ‘use’ of an infringing sign under Article 9(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the EUTM Regulation, should be interpreted and the approach courts are likely to take when considering whether an app store provider should be liable for infringing third-party apps offered through its platform. The judgment also discusses the availability of Directive 2000/31/EC, the E-Commerce Directive, defence and draws a clear distinction between passive online marketplace operators and app store providers who offer third-party apps for use on their own goods and services. Written by Mark Daniels, partner and Gavin Lock,...
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial