Home / Property Disputes / Contractual issues / Contractual disputes

Legal News

Farming proprietary estoppel claim (Spencer v Spencer)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 15 August 2023
Published by a LexisNexis Property Disputes expert

Article summary

Property disputes analysis: On 9 August 2023, the judgment in Spencer v Spencer, a farming proprietary estoppel claim, was handed down. Stephen Jourdan KC, Falcon Chambers, considers the decision and its implications.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
4 Precedents
View More
2 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
4 Precedents
View More
2 Q&As

Popular documents

Rectification—unilateral mistake

Rectification—unilateral mistakeRectification is an equitable remedy by which the court can correct an error of expression where a written document does not match the parties' intention. It is only available for written contracts and other documents (not oral agreements). This Practice Note explains

Liability for breach of property contract after completion

Liability for breach of property contract after completionThis Practice Note considers when contractual obligations merge on completion of a property contract and remedies that may be available after completion.For contractual remedies in relation to property contracts generally, see Practice Notes:

Specific performance of property agreements

Specific performance of property agreementsIf a party to a property agreement fails to comply with its obligations, the other party may wish to apply for an order for specific performance. Specific performance is an equitable, discretionary remedy which, if granted, compels a party to perform a

Misrepresentation, misstatement and non-disclosure in property matters

Misrepresentation, misstatement and non-disclosure in property mattersThis Practice Note looks at misrepresentation, misstatement and non-disclosure in property transactions. It covers a seller’s liability for replies given to enquiries before contract, a buyer’s possible remedies for