The following Property guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers the remedy of rectification for unilateral mistake. For rectification for common mistake, see Practice Note: Rectification—mutual mistake.
Rectification for unilateral mistake is available where one party makes a mistake in a document, the other party is aware of the error in their favour, and unconscionably takes advantage of it. Three elements must be present:
by the claimant’s mistake the agreement did not give effect to their subjective intention at the time of execution
there was no mistake by the defendant
the defendant was aware of the claimant’s mistake at the time of execution, and there was unconscionable behaviour by inducing execution or by standing by and allowing it
In Littman v Aspen Oil there was an error in a mutual break clause, which wrongly stated that exercise of the landlord’s (rather than tenant’s) break would be conditional on the tenant complying with all of its lease covenants. On the face of it, that error left the tenant free to exercise its break without precondition. When the tenant exercised its break the landlord claimed that the lease ought to be:
construed so that exercise by the tenant of its break right was conditional on compliance by the tenant with its covenants, or
rectified on the grounds of the landlord's unilateral mistake
The Court of Appeal
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234