Home / Corporate Crime

Legal News

FACT reports £963,000 court order payment for supplier of ISDs

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 08 June 2022

Published by LNB News

LNB News 08/06/2022

Document Information

Issue Date: 08 June 2022

Published Date: 08 June 2022

Jurisdiction(s): England and Wales

Article summary

FACT has reported that Steven King, who was found guilty of supplying illegal streaming devices (ISDs) providing unauthorised access to Premier League content in 2019, has now been ordered to pay back £963,000. Warwick Crown Court has warned that if he fails to do so, his current prison sentence of seven years and four months will be extended by six years and eight months. King was one of three operators found to be behind the pirate streaming operation Dreambox. They were jailed for a total of 17 years for conspiracy to defraud.

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of