- Expert evidence and professional discipline (Squier v General Medical Council)
- Original news
- What is this case about in a nutshell?
- Briefly, what is the context in which this appeal took place?
- What did the court decide on the main issues in the case?
- What are the key implications of the decision from a fitness to practise perspective?
- What criticisms did the court make of the MPT proceedings, and what did it indicate would be desirable when conducting proceedings of this sort in future?
- Are there any other learning points in this case for those wishing to instruct experts in future proceedings (not limited to similar cases), and if so what would they be?
- Limiting expert evidence to field of expertise
Corporate Crime analysis: Discussing the outcome and implications of Squier v GMC, Grace Forbes, barrister at 2 Hare Court Chambers, says the case serves as an important reminder of the expert ‘witness’responsibility to be conscious of professional limits and act with integrity at all times.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial