Legal News

Examining the valuation and apportionment of premium (Crown Estate Commissioners v Whitehall Court London)

Published on: 01 December 2017

Table of contents

  • Original news
  • What is the significance of this case?
  • How helpful is this judgment in clarifying the law in this area? Are there any remaining grey areas?
  • What are the practical implications of the judgment? What should practitioners be mindful of when advising in this area?
  • How does this case fit in with other developments in this area of the law? Do you have any predictions for future developments in this area?

Article summary

Property analysis: Does the ‘no-Act’ rights assumption apply to the whole building or a single flat? Caroline DeLaney, head of real estate disputes at Rosenblatt Solicitors, says the ruling in Crown Estate Commissioners v Whitehall Court London confirms for the first time the valuation assumption of the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993), as well as providing useful guidance on the interpretation of leases.

Popular documents