Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the FTT decide?
- Relevant law
Article summary
Pensions analysis: Karen Agnew-Griffith, divorce and family lawyer at Woolley & Co in Norfolk, considers the case of Kirby v Revenue and Customs Commissioners in which Mr Kirby argued he should not pay tax on his entire pension income as he pays 50% to his ex-wife as a result of a divorce and pension earmarking order.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial