Table of contents
- Original news
- What is the significance of the decision for authorities and developers?
- Green belt must be protected by planning enforcement
- Injunction is separate from compliance with enforcement notice
- Appealing enforcement notices
- What is the legislation and case law background to the case?
- Challinor test
- What was the factual background to the case?
- Why did the court uphold the injunction?
- Challinor exception—first limb
More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
Article summary
Planning analysis: In Wokingham BC v Scott, the court upheld an injunction to prevent breaches of planning control in the green belt, despite widespread public support for the development. The decision reminds practitioners of the importance of safeguarding green belt land and the limitations of appealing against enforcement notices.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial