Home / Dispute Resolution / Costs and funding / Summary assessment

Legal News

Court of Appeal: exercises its broad discretion on awarding costs to cut exaggerated amount (Grand v Gill)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 02 August 2011
Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert

Table of contents

  • Court details
  • Facts
  • Judgment
  • Comment

Article summary

Even if a party is entitled to an order for costs in principle, a court will use its discretion under CPR Part 44 to ensure that any costs awarded are proportionate to the matters in issue. Any doubt in relation to whether costs were reasonably incurred is resolved in favour of the paying party. In this case an application was made for £15,257 plus interest: the Court of Appeal awarded £703.77 with no interest.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

4 Checklists
View More
4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
2 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 Checklists
View More
4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
2 Q&As

Popular documents

Fixed costs—position prior to 1 October 2023

Fixed costs—position prior to 1 October 2023This Practice Note considers the fixed costs position prior to 1 October 2023 under Part 45. It explains the purpose of fixed costs and the different categories of claims and costs to which they are applicable.Note, the extension of the fixed costs came

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedings

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedingsThe general rule for detailed assessmentThe general rule for when detailed assessment is to take place is set out in CPR 47.1 which provides that the costs of any part of the proceedings are not to be determined by detailed assessment until the

Costs budgeting—completing Precedent T (particulars for varying a costs budget)

Costs budgeting—completing Precedent T (particulars for varying a costs budget)This Practice Note provides assistance in completing Precedent T. This is the court form that the parties are required to use when seeking party agreement, and/or court approval for a change to their agreed/approved

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a