Article summary
This week's edition of Construction weekly highlights includes a case in which the Court of Appeal considered whether the respondent was entitled to rely on a force majeure clause when the effects of the potential force majeure event could have been avoided by the acceptance of payment in an alternative currency (MUR Shipping v RTI), a case in which the Commercial Court ruled that a party was not prevented from terminating a contract for convenience where the other party had invoked an ‘excusable delay’ clause (Optimares v Qatar Airways), analysis of liability for the impact of strike action on contracts, publication of a report by Kings College London’s (KCL) providing a snapshot of UK's construction adjudication, and the release of the Construction Products Association (CPA)’s autumn forecast.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial