Article summary
Environment analysis: The case concerns the government’s Food Strategy and whether its failure to address the carbon emissions of meat and dairy products amounts to a breach of duty to put in place policies to ensure carbon budgets are met under Section 13 of the Climate Change Act 2008. The Court of Appeal’s answer to this question is ‘no’. The Court of Appeal also decided that when developing its carbon budgets, the Secretary of State for Energy, Security and Net Zero (formerly for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) is not obliged to give any significant (or even any) weight to the advice of the Climate Change Committee, or indeed to provide cogent reasons for not following it. The decision will be of interest to climate lawyers and lawyers acting for campaigning organisations. Written by Stephen Sykes, head of Climate, Environment and Sustainability, Capital Law Environmental...
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial