Life sciences clauses

This subtopic includes a selection of definitions and standard commercial clauses for use in agreements in the life sciences sector.

For boilerplate commercial clauses and standard definitions which may be used in life sciences agreements, see: Boilerplate clauses—overview and Definitions—overview.

For a summary of the law, guidance and practice in relation to the execution of documents, along with standard execution clauses, see: Execution—overview.

Life sciences definitions

For examples of definitions which are frequently used in life sciences agreements, see Precedents:

  1. Applicable Laws and Medical Product Law definitions—life sciences

  2. Clinical trial laws definition—life sciences

  3. Derivatives definition—life sciences

  4. EU Notified Body and UK Approved Body definition—life sciences

  5. Exploit definition—life sciences

  6. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) definition—life sciences

  7. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) definition—life sciences

  8. Governmental Entity definition—life sciences

  9. Industry Practice definition—life sciences

  10. Material definition—life sciences

  11. Principal investigator (PI) definition—life sciences

  12. Product definition—life sciences

  13. Progeny definition—life sciences

  14. Regulatory Documentation definition—life sciences

  15. Regulatory Approvals definition—life sciences

  16. Regulatory Authority definition—life sciences

Intellectual property

Intellectual

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Life Sciences News

MHRA publishes blog post highlighting £1.4bn opportunity from medicines reclassification

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has published a blog post authored by Proprietary Association of Great Britain (PAGB) CEO, Michelle Riddalls OBE, outlining what PAGB describes as a £1.4bn opportunity to transform healthcare through expanded medicines reclassification. Riddalls argues that increasing switches from prescription-only (POM) to pharmacy (P) or general sales list (GSL) status could improve timely access to treatments for common conditions, strengthen self-care and ease pressure on primary care, with the MHRA describing reclassification as a practical way to broaden access to trusted medicines and enable safe self-management of minor conditions. She states that 74% of adults want more medicines available without a prescription, positioning consumer demand as a key driver of switch applications, and frames reclassification as a catalyst for a prevention-focused healthcare model that enhances the role of community pharmacists and supports wider public health goals. Referencing previous switches to over-the-counter (OTC) status, including Nurofen, Allevia and Calpol, as well as low-dose vaginal oestrogen products and Viagra, she highlights both market impact and social significance and calls for reform of the legal framework for certain injectable medicines, pointing to potential benefits in areas including weight management and emergency treatments. Riddalls states that a 5% reduction in NHS prescribing could save £1.4bn annually, with productivity gains of up to £18bn linked to improved OTC symptom management. PAGB adds that reclassification is one of the most practical and impactful opportunities to strengthen self-care and deliver the ambitions of the NHS 10 Year Plan, citing clear opportunity, strong public demand and persuasive supporting evidence.

View Life Sciences by content type :

Popular documents