Life sciences clauses

This subtopic includes a selection of definitions and standard commercial clauses for use in agreements in the life sciences sector.

For boilerplate commercial clauses and standard definitions which may be used in life sciences agreements, see: Boilerplate clauses—overview and Definitions—overview.

For a summary of the law, guidance and practice in relation to the execution of documents, along with standard execution clauses, see: Execution—overview.

Life sciences definitions

For examples of definitions which are frequently used in life sciences agreements, see Precedents:

  1. Applicable Laws and Medical Product Law definitions—life sciences

  2. Clinical trial laws definition—life sciences

  3. Derivatives definition—life sciences

  4. EU Notified Body and UK Approved Body definition—life sciences

  5. Exploit definition—life sciences

  6. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) definition—life sciences

  7. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) definition—life sciences

  8. Governmental Entity definition—life sciences

  9. Industry Practice definition—life sciences

  10. Material definition—life sciences

  11. Principal investigator (PI) definition—life sciences

  12. Product definition—life sciences

  13. Progeny definition—life sciences

  14. Regulatory Documentation definition—life sciences

  15. Regulatory Approvals definition—life sciences

  16. Regulatory Authority definition—life sciences

Intellectual property

Intellectual

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Life Sciences News

Team-NB raises concerns over proposed MDR and IVDR revisions

The European Association of Medical Devices Notified Bodies (Team-NB) has published a position paper on the European Commission’s proposed targeted revisions to Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (Medical Device Regulation (MDR)) and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR)). Team-NB supports measures aimed at improving predictability, transparency and efficiency in conformity assessment, and acknowledges that the MDR and IVDR have strengthened quality, clinical evidence and regulatory compliance across the sector. However, it notes that key initiatives, including the European Database on Medical Devices (EUDAMED) and the development of Common Specifications, remain incomplete and states that any further reforms should be evidence-based, realistic and implemented in a way that supports rather than disrupts the existing system. It also questions the Commission’s estimate of €2.1bn in conformity assessment savings, arguing that total notified body revenue in 2024 amounted to €475m, representing only a small proportion of the €170bn EU MedTech market. The paper further identifies positive elements in the proposal, such as increased digitalisation, strengthened regulatory dialogue and measures designed to facilitate innovation. It also addresses the proposed mandatory fee discounts for micro and small manufacturers, citing survey data indicating that 54% of such manufacturers placing devices on the EU market are based outside the EU, and outlining the potential implications for notified body revenues and broader market dynamics.

View Life Sciences by content type :

Popular documents