Boilerplate clauses

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

This subtopic focuses on boilerplate clauses in commercial business-to-business agreements. For information on commercial clauses more generally, see: Commercial clauses—overview.

For information on boilerplate in business-to-consumer contracts, see the section on ‘Consumer boilerplate’ below.

For information on boilerplate in public sector contracts, see the section on ‘Public sector boilerplate’ below.

The role of boilerplate

Lawyers work on a huge variety of transactions, but all of them will in some way involve written agreements. All of those agreements should contain some boilerplate clauses.

‘Boilerplate’ is the term used to describe the clauses that are included in an agreement to deal with the mechanics of how it works and those legal points that are relevant to most transactions. For further consideration of the role and importance of boilerplate clauses, see Practice Note: The role of boilerplate.

Boilerplate clauses are generally found at the beginning and the end of an agreement. Such clauses are often thought of as standard, miscellaneous provisions, but this is a very dangerous view to adopt. It is not unusual for a boilerplate clause to be the cause of litigation. Since a boilerplate clause

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Life Sciences News

Life Sciences weekly highlights—26 February 2026

This week's edition of Life Sciences weekly highlights includes a Law 360 analysis on the Court of Appeal dismissing Salts Healthcare Ltd’s renewed attempts to find Pelican Healthcare Ltd liable for infringing one of its patents over an ostomy bag and an analysis by Hepworth Browne of the UK Supreme Court’s ruling in Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, in which the court reshaped the foundations of UK patent law by reorientating the assessment of exclusions to patentability. Also included, is news that the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals in a biotechnology patent dispute regarding the production of microbial oil for nutritional products, the EU General Court issued orders in challenges concerning the revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) on the grounds of admissibility, not addressing the substantive question of the legality of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme, the MHRA and NICE have jointly published guidance on the Integrated Scientific Advice service, EFPIA published a report assessing the economic and societal contribution of industry-sponsored clinical trials in Europe as well as a comparative analysis of biopharmaceutical strategies across ten countries, and news that the UK Research and Innovation announced its first AI strategy, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) announced £150m for three UK Research and Innovation programmes, as well as MHRA updates reporting a rise in clinical investigations, the launch of a fee waiver pilot for small firms, a statement on the paused PATHWAYS clinical trial, and enforcement action involving the seizure of unlicensed weight loss medicines, among other stories.

EFPIA and Medicines for Europe call for suspension of UWWTD EPR scheme implementation

The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) and Medicines for Europe and other organisations representing the cosmetics and pharmaceutical sectors have urged EU Ministers of Economy to ask the European Commission to ‘stop the clock’ on  implementing the extended producer responsibility (EPR) scheme under Directive (EU) 2024/3019 (Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive, UWWTD). They state that the cost of upgrading wastewater treatment to remove micropollutants may be significantly higher than the Commission’s estimate of up to up to €1.4bn annually until 2045. They also raise concerns that the methodology used to allocate toxic load to sectors overstated the contribution of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics to urban wastewater pollution. They argue that limiting EPR obligations to those sectors is inconsistent with the polluter pays principle. In addition, they indicate that the directive could result in increased financial and administrative burdens, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises, and note that fixed pricing mechanisms in the pharmaceutical sector may limit the ability to pass on additional compliance costs, with potential implications for medicine supply. They call for a pause in the EPR-related provisions and for a further science-based reassessment of the directive’s impact.

Commission adopts recommendation on diagnostic reference levels for medical radiation procedures

The European Commission has adopted Recommendation (Euratom/2026/403) on the establishment, review and use of diagnostic reference levels for radiodiagnostic examinations and interventional radiology procedures. Building on Directive 2013/59/Euratom (the Euratom Basic Safety Standards Directive), the recommendation sets out methodologies and good practices for establishing, maintaining and periodically reviewing national diagnostic reference level systems for the medical use of ionising radiation. The measure forms part of the Strategic Agenda for Medical Ionising Radiation Applications (SAMIRA) Action Plan, an EU initiative aimed at ensuring the safe, high quality and reliable use of radiological and nuclear technology in healthcare.

MHRA raids two premises seizing unlicensed weight loss medicines

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has conducted raids on two premises in Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire as part of an ongoing investigation into an organised criminal network involved in manufacturing unlicensed weight loss medicines. The Criminal Enforcement Unit (CEU), supported by Lincolnshire Police, Immigration Enforcement and Lincolnshire Trading Standards, seized almost 2,000 doses of unauthorised weight loss medicines awaiting dispatch to customers, alongside manufacturing equipment, suspected pharmaceutical ingredients, packaging and commercial vehicles. The premises searched comprised a farm near Sleaford and a residential address in Grantham, believed to have been used for manufacturing and distributing unlicensed weight loss medicines including retatrutide and tirzepatide, as well as peptide products. The operation follows a previous raid in October 2025 in which CEU officers dismantled what the MHRA described as the UK's first illicit weight loss medicine manufacturing facility in Northampton.

View Life Sciences by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of
Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of