Schemes of arrangement—key cases
Published by a LexisNexis Restructuring & Insolvency expert
Practice notesSchemes of arrangement—key cases
Published by a LexisNexis Restructuring & Insolvency expert
Practice notesThis Practice Note sets out certain key cases and associated relevant content in relation to Schemes of arrangement. The cases are divided by topic area and include:
- •
Class issues
- •
Jurisdiction/sufficient connection issues
- •
Valuation issues
- •
Scheme meeting/voting and cram-down
- •
Convening hearing/sanction hearing issues
Class issues
Names of parties | Judgment date | Case summary | Relevant content |
Re OQ Chemicals Holding Drei GmbH [2024] EWHC 2036 (Ch) (convening hearing), [2024] All ER (D) 27 (Aug) | 31 July 2024 | Single class permitted despite various proposed amendments for a snooze provision, amendment of sacred rights and various fees.Snooze proposal: to amend the credit agreement to disregard the votes of term lenders who do not respond to a request for an amendment, consent or waiver within ten business days of the request. This disproportionately affects the rights of term lenders because the 'snooze' will not apply to any amendment, consent or waiver which requires the consent of the revolving facility lenders. The judge found that the substantive element of the right is the ability to participate |
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.