Reviews of insolvency orders

Produced in partnership with Matthew Parfitt of Erskine Chambers
Practice notes

Reviews of insolvency orders

Produced in partnership with Matthew Parfitt of Erskine Chambers

Practice notes
imgtext

Reviews in Insolvency proceedings

A review in insolvency proceedings is where the court revisits and reviews an order already made by it. The review process (in both corporate and personal insolvency) allows a decision to be reviewed either by the judge that made it (see Official receiver v Bathurst) or by another judge (see Re W & A Glaser Limited).

The power to review orders is unique to the insolvency court. The power of the corporate insolvency court to review its own orders is contained in Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, r 12.59(1), which states that the corporate insolvency court can review, rescind or vary any order made by it in the exercise of its jurisdiction. The provision for the personal insolvency court is contained in section 375 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). This provision (similar to the corporate insolvency provision) states that the court may review, rescind or vary any order made by it in the exercise of its jurisdiction.

Reviews must not be seen as an alternative

Matthew Parfitt
Matthew Parfitt

Barrister, Erskine Chambers


Matthew is an advocate, litigator and adviser who specialises in company and insolvency law.

In 2020 he was appointed to the Attorney General’s A Panel to act in the most complex and significant government litigation. He spent ten years on the B and C Panels which allowed him to develop substantial unled advocacy experience.

He is ranked in Chambers & Partners and in the Legal 500 as a leading junior for company law and, in the Legal 500, for insolvency. The directories say he is a “clever, accommodating and client-friendly junior counsel”; “he is quietly persuasive and his advocacy is faultless”; and he has “a cool head, a comprehensive knowledge of his field and an excellent responsiveness to pressurised demands”.

He was appointed as a Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge in 2020.

Recent important cases include:

  • Re Akkurate Ltd [2020] EWHC 1433 (Ch) (the leading case on the extra-territorial effect of section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986)
  • Re Columbus Energy Resources plc [2020] EWHC 2452 (Ch) (establishing for the first time the effect of the CIGA 2020 on court meetings in the context of a scheme of arrangement, leading Philip Morrison)
  • Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd v Fielding [2019] EWHC 1566 (Ch) (the leading case on the liability of directors for unlawful dividends); [2019] EWHC 2995 Ch (successful non-party costs application against an insolvency practitioner’s firm); [2018] UKSC 14 (Supreme Court – limitation period for claims against directors)

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Insolvency definition
What does Insolvency mean?

This can be defined by two alternative tests (Insolvency Act 1986, s 123):

cash flow test: a company is solvent if it can pay its debts as they fall due, no matter what the state of its balance sheet (Re Patrick & Lyon Ltd [1933] Ch 786);

• balance sheet test: a company which can pay its debts as they fall due may be insolvent if, according to its balance sheet, liabilities (including contingent liabilities) exceed assets.

Popular documents