The following Public Law practice note Produced in partnership with Carolyn Morgan of Harper Macleod LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Judicial review represents the means by which the courts control the exercise of governmental power. Judicial review has developed to ensure that public bodies, which exercise law-making or adjudicatory powers, are kept within the confines of the power conferred.
The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) extended the traditional scope of judicial review to protect instances where a public body fails to respect the human rights of an individual. The HRA 1998 requires that all public bodies comply with the right protected by the European Convention on Human Rights and judicial review proceedings may be brought to enforce that legal duty. For more information see: Dealing with a human rights challenge.
Decision makers must not only exercise their powers in the correct manner as prescribed by the statute and in accordance with human rights, but must also comply with the rules of reasonableness, natural justice and fairness.
In essence, the courts seek, by judicial review, to ensure four principal objectives:
that Acts of Parliament have been correctly interpreted
that discretion conferred by statute has been lawfully exercised
that the decision maker has acted fairly, and
that the exercise of power does not violate human rights
To a large extent, the court is more interested in the process of decision making rather than the actual result. The scope of judicial review and its relationship
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the nature and scope of arbitration agreements with a particular focus on arbitration agreements pursuant to the law of England and Wales, although it also discusses the concept from an international perspective and includes some comparative examples from other
The primary function of office-holders in personal and corporate insolvency is to collect in the assets belonging to a company or individual and to distribute these to the company's or individual's creditors. Office-holders have various duties and powers in order to ensure that they do this. For
BREXIT: As of exit day (31 January 2020), the UK is no longer an EU Member State. However, in accordance with the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK has entered an implementation period, during which it continues to be subject to EU law. This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.