If works (removal of a roof) are carried out in satisfaction of the pre-commencement conditions contained in a planning permission and the permission is later quashed, do the works carried out prior to the quashing need to be reversed or should works simply cease at the point of quashing? If the works are required to be reversed, is a new planning permission needed for this?

Rosalind Andrews is Head of Planning & Highways Law at Harrison Clark Rickerbys solicitors, covering the firm’s nine offices. She specialises in Planning and Highways Law, and advises on a range of contentious and non-contentious planning matters, including strategic planning advice, judicial review and other Planning Court challenges, and planning enforcement issues. She acts on behalf of a variety of clients, with particular experience of acting for developers and promoters in relation to residential development. She also acts on behalf of lenders, registered providers of affordable housing, and local authorities, as well as third parties with an interest in the planning process, such as local residents' groups. As well as negotiating Section 106 Obligations and other infrastructure agreements, she also advises on other matters affecting development, such as town and village greens, public rights of way, assets of community value, tree preservation orders, and compulsory purchase.