Expropriation—investment treaty arbitration
Produced in partnership with Ben Sanderson
Practice notesExpropriation—investment treaty arbitration
Produced in partnership with Ben Sanderson
Practice notesA definition of Expropriation
In the context of Investment Treaty Arbitration, expropriation occurs when a state has taken a foreign investor’s property for which compensation is required.
One of the core protections provided by nearly all bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and multilateral investment treaties (MITs) is the protection against expropriation (or nationalisation) without adequate compensation.
However, the language used in treaties often provides little express guidance on what specifically is understood to constitute expropriation. As a result, many investment treaty arbitration tribunals have grappled with defining the limits of what constitutes a 'taking' of property and the minimum Requirements of what constitutes 'adequate' compensation.
The task of providing a clear definition is further complicated by the fact that the provisions found in BITs are similar, but not identical. These subtle drafting differences have become the focus of detailed analysis in a number of investment treaty awards. This Practice Note will use the UK Model BIT to explore these issues in further detail.
Practice Notes: Investment treaty arbitration—an introduction and Protections for foreign Investors and investment treaty arbitration provide
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.