The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Supreme Court considered the duty of care owed by public authorities in the cases of Michael and Robinson.
In Michael, Ms Michael made a 999 call to inform the police that her former partner had threatened to kill her. However, the call handler failed to pass on the threat to kill and as a result the 999 call was given a lower priority which caused a delay in the police response. Ms Michael was killed by her ex-partner before the police arrived.
In Robinson, an elderly pedestrian was knocked over by police officers who were trying to arrest a suspected drug dealer.
In these cases, the Supreme Court set out the following general principles which apply in cases against public authorities:
a duty of care is owed to avoid negligent acts (subject to harm being foreseeable)
the common law does not normally impose a duty of care to protect individuals from harm caused by a third party unless the public authority:
was in a position of control over the third party and harm was foreseeable, or
assumed responsibility for an individual’s safety on which that individual relied and harm was foreseeable
In Michael, the Supreme Court found that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to Ms Michael on the basis that the negligence was a
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
On 29 August 2015, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the PRA Rulebook (Rulebook). The transition from the Handbook to the Rulebook was intended to benefit PRA-authorised firms, to access clearer and more concise rules. Alongside the Rulebook, supervisory statements and statements
Criminal offences are generally divided into two categories: •conduct crimes, and •result crimesA conduct crime is a crime where only the forbidden conduct needs to be proved. For example, an accused is guilty of dangerous driving if they drove a motor vehicle dangerously on a road or other public
You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:
The roles of nominated officer and money laundering reporting officerA nominated officer is an individual who is nominated by a firm to receive disclosures under Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) or Part III of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000)—see Requirement to appoint a
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.