Q&As
A landlord entered into a lease of commercial premises with a tenant company and an individual guarantor and accepted rent for a number of years. The lease includes an express forfeiture clause. The landlord then discovers that the tenant company did not exist at the time the lease was granted. The rent was being paid by the guarantor who is running a business at the premises. Arguably, an implied periodic tenancy arose with the guarantor and the terms of the tenancy are set out in the lease. Is the fact that the lease contains the express forfeiture clause likely to be sufficient for the landlord to forfeit by peaceable re-entry?
Published on: 12 April 2018
This Q&A considers forfeiture of commercial premises where it is argued that an implied tenancy exists.
An implied tenancy may arise where a person is in exclusive possession of premises by the owner’s consent, and their possession is not as employee or agent or as a licensee holding under an irrevocable licence, and is not held in virtue of any freehold estate or of any tenancy
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.