Orders restricting further applications

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Restriction on further applications under the Children Act 1989—s 91(14) orders

When the court disposes of any application for an order under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) it may make an order under ChA 1989, s 91(14) ( a s 91(14) order), that no application for an order under that Act of any specified kind may be made with respect to the child concerned by any person named in the order without the leave of the court.

An order under ChA 1989, s 91(14) does not stop an application being made to the court but they are a protective filter made by the court, in the interests of children. The effect of a s 91(14) order is to restrict an applicant who would otherwise have an automatic entitlement to apply to the court for an order from being able to do so, without obtaining permission from the court.

A s 91(14) order may be made in relation to both private law and public law proceedings.

See Practice Note: Restriction on further applications under the Children Act 1989—section 91(14)

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Correct timescales and the procedure for applications for permission to appeal (Re F (A Minor) (Permission To Appeal))

Family analysis: Mr Justice Hayden gave consideration to the requirements, including timescales, on an application for permission to appeal made to the trial judge and after considering the relevant case law and procedural rules, provided guidance on the correct approach, together with wording to be included in judgments to ensure certainty as to the date of hand-down for the purposes of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010). Teertha Gupta, KC at 4PB, summarises the approach.

The necessity of a DOLs order where all parties with parental responsibility consent (J (through his Children's Guardian) v Bath and North East Somerset Council and others)

Family analysis: The Court of Appeal held that even in cases where the local authority and the parents of a profoundly disabled 14-year-old agreed to a restrictive regime for him, contrary to the decision of Mr Justice Lieven in the court below, a deprivation of liberty (DOLs) order was necessary, as Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was engaged. Had the decision of Lieven J been allowed to stand, the logical consequence would have been that there would have been no need for any local authority to apply for a DOLs order where it holds a care order for the child. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and gave clear guidance that a local authority cannot 'mark its own homework'. Teertha Gupta KC at 4PB considers the issues.

Principles applicable by Court of Protection for recognition and enforcement of Scottish Guardianship order (Argyll and Bute Council v RF)

Private Client analysis: The case concerns a guardianship order made in Scotland in January 2025 for three years in respect of RF. There were two issues in the case. The first was whether the guardianship order gave Argyll and Bute Council (‘the Local Authority’) the power to authorise the deprivation of RF’s liberty in England. The second issue was, if so, whether the Court of Protection in England and Wales should grant recognition and enforcement of the guardianship order as applied for by the Local Authority. The Official Solicitor on behalf of RF opposed the application on the grounds that there was no effective route for RF to challenge his confinement or trigger a review of the restrictions on him. In dealing with these arguments the court gave a useful analysis of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) as applied to any specific guardianship order. Written by Lynne Counsell, barrister at Addington Chambers.

President of the Family Division delivers speech on changes and future priorities

The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has delivered a speech at the 2025 Resolution Conference reflecting on decades of change in family justice, recent achievements and future priorities. Through collaborative effort, Sir Andrew reflected that the system has achieved a reduction of approximately 20% in public law cases and 30% in private law cases from Covid-era highs.

View Family by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Can an adult apply to revoke an adoption order that was made during their minority?

Can an adult apply to revoke an adoption order that was made during their minority?The adoption of a child severs all the child’s legal ties with their birth family and establishes a new legal relationship with the child’s adoptive family. The law does allow for applications to revoke an adoption

A child is subject to a supervision order made under section 31 of the Children Act 1989. The court

A child is subject to a supervision order made under section 31 of the Children Act 1989. The court allowed the mother to take the child out of the jurisdiction to another EU country for a relative's funeral. The mother is now refusing to return the child. What steps may be taken by the local

Interim orders in public children proceedings

Interim orders in public children proceedingsThis Practice Note sets out the requirements in relation to interim orders in public children proceedings including the criteria and nature of interim orders and the duration, effect and termination of an interim order. It also provides guidance on

Public Law Working Group report—templates and checklists

Public Law Working Group report—templates and checklistsThis Practice Note provides information about the ‘Recommendations to achieve best practice in the child protection and family justice systems’ report (the PLWG report) prepared by the Public Law Working Group (PLWG) and endorsed by the
Can an adult apply to revoke an adoption order that was made during their minority?

Can an adult apply to revoke an adoption order that was made during their minority?

Can an adult apply to revoke an adoption order that was made during their minority?The adoption of a child severs all the child’s legal ties with their birth family and establishes a new legal relationship with the child’s adoptive family. The law does allow for applications to revoke an adoption

A child is subject to a supervision order made under section 31 of the Children Act 1989. The court

A child is subject to a supervision order made under section 31 of the Children Act 1989. The court

A child is subject to a supervision order made under section 31 of the Children Act 1989. The court allowed the mother to take the child out of the jurisdiction to another EU country for a relative's funeral. The mother is now refusing to return the child. What steps may be taken by the local

Interim orders in public children proceedings

Interim orders in public children proceedings

Interim orders in public children proceedingsThis Practice Note sets out the requirements in relation to interim orders in public children proceedings including the criteria and nature of interim orders and the duration, effect and termination of an interim order. It also provides guidance on

Public Law Working Group report—templates and checklists

Public Law Working Group report—templates and checklists

Public Law Working Group report—templates and checklistsThis Practice Note provides information about the ‘Recommendations to achieve best practice in the child protection and family justice systems’ report (the PLWG report) prepared by the Public Law Working Group (PLWG) and endorsed by the