Care and supervision orders

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

Procedure

Under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, provision is made by FPR 2010, PD 12A (the Public Law Outline (PLO)) for a tightly managed case management system in relation to proceedings under Part IV of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) including:

  1. •

    pre-proceedings checklists

  2. •

    annex documents

  3. •

    advocates' meetings

  4. •

    case management hearings

  5. •

    issues resolution hearings, and

  6. •

    directions

See Practice Note: Public law children procedure—Public Law Outline.

Local authority duties

ChA 1989 provides for local authority social services departments to be responsible for making sure that children are safe and appropriately cared for by their parents or a person looking after them. Local authorities also have a general duty of care to promote the well-being of children in their area and are responsible for investigating any child in their area where they have cause to suspect the child is suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm.

Typically a local authority may start an investigation where:

  1. •

    it is directed to do so by the court

  2. •

    there is a persistent

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Family weekly highlights—5 February 2026

This week's edition of the Family weekly highlights includes analyses of cross-border child maintenance after Brexit, together with the power of the Court of Protection to make orders to implement best interests decisions. Details of payment by account number selection for placement applications via the Family Public Law portal are set out. Recent judgments on the disclosure of information from concluded public children proceedings to the disclosure and barring service, special guardianship orders and the determination of local authority accommodation duties under section 20 of the Children Act 1989 are also considered.

Master of the Rolls speech addresses AI integration in civil and criminal justice systems

The Master of the Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos, delivered a speech on 4 February 2026 examining how artificial intelligence (AI) could enable civil and criminal justice outcomes to be delivered more quickly and efficiently than through human decision-making alone. He highlighted that a Digital Justice System is being established under the Online Procedure Rules Committee, while emphasising that human oversight must remain central to final justice decisions. He also raised questions as to whether machines can constitute ‘independent and impartial tribunals’ for the purposes of article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The speech also identified several key unresolved issues, including when parties should be required to consent to machine-made decisions and how article 14 of the EU AI Act may affect the deployment of AI within justice systems.

Cross-border child maintenance after Brexit (MM v FF (Maintenance: Scope of EU Withdrawal Agreement))

Family analysis: This case analysis examines how the Family Court approached jurisdiction and case management in a long-running cross-border child maintenance dispute to which the EU Maintenance Regulation applied, and the wider comments made by the judge about delay, access to legal aid and difficulties in international maintenance cases.

Power of the COP to make orders to implement best interests decisions (University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Another v AB (By his Litigation Friend) and others)

Private Client analysis: Mr Justice Williams found that AB lacked capacity and it was in his best interests to be conveyed to hospital for an in-patient stay to allow assessment and treatment. He held that, to implement his best interest decisions, he was able to impose duties on AB’s mother in her role as AB’s Deputy for Personal Welfare. He further held that he was able to rely on the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to make orders authorising the applicants and third parties to implement his decision, including by allowing them to enter the property without permission to access AB and remove him to hospital. This case considers what tools the Court of Protection has at its disposal to ensure compliance with best interests decisions made on behalf of P and on what basis these tools are available to the Court of Protection. Written by Dr Anton van Dellen and Natasha Niccolls, barristers at Fraser Chambers.

View Family by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Can the court, within care proceedings, make a non-molestation order of its own motion that prevents a

Can the court, within care proceedings, make a non-molestation order of its own motion that prevents a parent from entering the family home?Section 42(2)(b) of the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) provides the court with the power to make a non-molestation order of its own motion in any family

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989Under section 37 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the court has the power to order a local authority an investigate the welfare of a child if it appears that a public law order, namely a supervision order or a care order, may be appropriate. The

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid
Can the court, within care proceedings, make a non-molestation order of its own motion that prevents a

Can the court, within care proceedings, make a non-molestation order of its own motion that prevents a

Can the court, within care proceedings, make a non-molestation order of its own motion that prevents a parent from entering the family home?Section 42(2)(b) of the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) provides the court with the power to make a non-molestation order of its own motion in any family

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989Under section 37 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the court has the power to order a local authority an investigate the welfare of a child if it appears that a public law order, namely a supervision order or a care order, may be appropriate. The

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid