Designs

Designs

This subtopic provides an overview of design rights under EU.

The World Intellectual Property Office defines intellectual property (IP) as ‘creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; design; and symbols, names and images used in commerce’. Broadly, the aim of IP law is to cultivate an environment in which creativity and invention can flourish. Protection of IP rights means those that invest time and resource in creating and developing IP can reap benefit from their investment. By registering (where necessary), maintaining and enforcing IP rights, a rights holder can prevent people stealing or copying valuable assets.

The four most common IP rights are:

•
copyright, databases and associated rights
•
designs
•
patents, and
•
trade marks

This subtopic focuses on design rights. Design rights protect the shape, configuration or appearance of the whole or part of a product or article. A design may comprise three-dimensional features, such as the shape or surface of an article or two-dimensional features such as surface decoration, patterns or colour. To qualify for protection, a design

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest EU Law News

Danish Presidency of Council of the EU publishes presidency programme

The Danish Presidency of the Council of the EU has published its programme for 1 July to 31 December 2025, outlining its priorities and direction under the presidency's focus on ‘A strong Europe in a changing world’. The presidency aims to strengthen the EU’s capacity to act autonomously amid growing global instability by focusing on security, competitiveness and the green transition. Legislative efforts will prioritise bolstering defence, economic resilience, and climate neutrality. Additionally, the presidency seeks to reduce regulatory burdens and promote EU enlargement. Full details are available in the programme document and more details can be found below.

EBA publishes final guidelines on residential ADC exposures under CRR

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published its final Guidelines on the treatment of Acquisition, Development and Construction (ADC) exposures to residential property under the Capital Requirements Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 575/2013) (CRR). The Guidelines specify the conditions under which institutions may apply a 100% risk weight, instead of 150%, to ADC exposures that meet defined credit risk mitigation requirements. These include a requirement that at least 50% of total contracts are pre-sale, pre-lease, or sale and lease contracts with specified deposit thresholds, and that the obligor has substantial equity at risk—set at 25% of the property’s value upon completion, reduced from 35% following consultation feedback and QIS data. The Guidelines also introduce more flexibility for public housing projects, allowing the first condition to be met based on demand exceeding supply and reducing the equity requirement to 20%, with a broader scope of eligible equity. These Guidelines form part of the first phase of the EBA’s roadmap on credit risk implementation of the EU Banking Package.

Commission publishes proposed reforms to EU securitisation framework in impact assessment

The European Commission has published an impact assessment on proposed amendments to EU securitisation regulations. The assessment focuses on modifications to Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, addressing overcorrection in the post-Global Financial Crisis framework. While the current stringent rules have enhanced market security, the evaluation concludes that they have also stifled market development and rendered securitisation expensive and unappealing due to the high prudential requirements.

New MDCG guidance on the interplay between the MDR/IVDR and the EU AI Act

Life Sciences analysis: Hélène Boland, senior associate and Fabien Roy, partner of Hogan Lovells, consider the key takeaways from the MDCG 2025-6 guidance on the interplay between the MDR/IVDR and the EU AI Act.