Bankruptcy offences

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Bankruptcy is an insolvency process for individuals, which commences on the day the bankruptcy order is made.

For information on bankruptcy proceedings generally, see:

  1. •

    Bankruptcy—overview

  2. •

    Personal insolvency for dispute resolution practitioners: bankruptcy

  3. •

    Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure post-presentation of the petition

Many of the criminal offences created by IA 1986 relate to the failure of a bankrupt person to perform their duties under IA 1986.

Bankruptcy offences

The bankruptcy offences are found in the IA 1986, Pt IX, Chapter VI.

All the offences are triable either-way so can be tried in the magistrates' court or in the Crown Court and, proceedings in each case can only be instituted by the Secretary of State or by, or with the consent of, the Director of Public Prosecutions.

The maximum penalty for each bankruptcy offence is set out in the IA 1986, Sch 10.

There is little guidance on sentencing those convicted of a bankruptcy offence. However, the Court of Appeal has said that those who conceal assets and use them to pay personal debts could expect to receive a custodial sentence,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate Crime News

Jonathan Fisher KC updates on fraud offences and disclosure reform progress

Chair of the Home Office Independent Review of Disclosure and Fraud Offences, Jonathan Fisher KC has published an update outlining the progress of the review's second phase. The update identifies three focus areas: whistleblowing mechanisms for fraud detection, sentencing reform and technological/legislative changes. Fisher reports consulting over 120 stakeholders across the justice system and plans to submit final recommendations to the Home Secretary by end-2025. The review examines the Fraud Act 2006's effectiveness for internet fraud cases, which now constitute 43% of all recorded crime in England and Wales.

FCA announces two individuals sentenced for £1.5m crypto fraud

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced that Raymondip Bedi and Patrick Mavanga have been sentenced to a combined 12 years’ imprisonment for their roles in a £1.5m crypto fraud. Between February 2017 and June 2019, the individuals cold-called victims and sold fake investments in crypto consultancy services. At least 65 investors were defrauded, with total losses amounting to £1,541,799. Bedi was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court to five years and four months’ imprisonment, and Mavanga received a sentence of six years and six months. Both had previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to breach the general prohibition under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Bedi also admitted to money laundering offences, while Mavanga was additionally convicted of perverting the course of justice. Confiscation proceedings are continuing. The FCA says that it has attempted to contact investors who lost out and has asked any who have not yet been contacted to come forward.

CPS publishes condensed version of DG6 to streamline case preparation

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has published clearer guidance on building strong criminal case files in collaboration with police forces. A simplified version of the Director’s Charging Guidance (DG6), has been reduced from 66 pages to eight, improving accessibility for investigators. Feedback from the Joint Operational Improvement Board indicated that the original format was overly complex for straightforward cases. In response, a working group, including CPS, police forces and the National Police Chiefs’ Council, redrafted the guidance over several months. Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Parkinson and Chief Constable Sacha Hatchett welcomed the new guide, noting its potential to expedite justice by enhancing case file quality and preparation. The simplified guidance will be distributed to all 44 police forces in England and Wales, operating alongside the full DG6 document.

High Court orders thorough and independent investigation into MI5 false evidence

In HM Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corp; R (on the application of ‘Beth’) v The Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2025] EWHC 1669 (KB), the High Court rejected findings from two investigations into MI5's provision of false evidence regarding an informant known as ‘X’. The court found major procedural deficiencies in both MI5's internal investigation and an external review by former Head of the Government Legal Department, Sir Jonathan Jones KC. The judgment called for a new independent investigation and criticised MI5's continued reliance on ‘neither confirm nor deny’ policies in legal proceedings. The case arose from MI5 providing false evidence in 2022 injunction proceedings brought by the Attorney General against the BBC. The Centre for Women’s Justice issued a statement on the ruling and its wider implications.

View Corporate Crime by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Asset stripping

Asset strippingWhat is asset stripping?Asset stripping is the controversial practice involving the purchase of a company and the deliberate depletion of that company’s assets for personal gain or to increase short-term profits. A subset of asset stripping is ‘phoenixing’, a practice which involves

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit
Asset stripping

Asset stripping

Asset strippingWhat is asset stripping?Asset stripping is the controversial practice involving the purchase of a company and the deliberate depletion of that company’s assets for personal gain or to increase short-term profits. A subset of asset stripping is ‘phoenixing’, a practice which involves

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit