Theft offences

Theft offences

The most common offences prosecuted under the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968) are:

•
theft—TA 1968, ss 1–7
•
false accounting—TA 1968, s 17
•
burglary—TA 1968, s 9
•
handling stolen goods—TA 1968, s 22
•
robbery—TA 1968, s 8, and
•
blackmail—TA 1968, s 21
•
vehicle taking and aggravated vehicle taking—TA 1968, s 12

These offences are triable in the magistrates' court or Crown Court, with the exception of robbery, blackmail and certain categories of burglary, which must be tried on indictment in the Crown Court.

There are also other offences outside of TA 1968 which involve a theft or stealing of some kind.

Dishonesty in the criminal law

Stealing offences, such as theft, burglary and robbery are all classified as 'dishonesty' offences. This means that they require proof of actual dishonesty as part of the mens rea element of the offence.

'Dishonesty' is not defined in the TA 1968. The decision as to whether or not a defendant is dishonest lies with the jury or magistrates. When dishonesty

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Corporate Crime News

Corporate Crime weekly highlights—4 September 2025

This week's edition of Corporate Crime weekly highlights includes the final instalment of a three-part news analysis series on the failure to prevent fraud offence, which came into force on 1 September 2025, exploring whether failure to prevent offences are truly effective in holding corporate bodies accountable for economic crime. Also included is analysis of the updated Joint SFO-CPS Corporate Prosecution Guidance reflecting expanded corporate criminal liability provisions, of the Insolvency Service’s 2026–31 Investigations and Enforcement Strategy emphasising the Insolvency Service’s role as a prosecuting agency, and of the Product Regulation and Metrology Act 2025 marking the beginning of reform of the UK’s product safety regime. Also included is news of the introduction of the Sentencing Bill, of COPFS expanding of its self-reporting policy for economic crimes to include the failure to prevent offences, and of a major tax fraud and counterfeit goods case resulting in a £90m confiscation order. All this, and more, in this week’s Corporate Crime highlights.

Law Commission launches 14th Programme with ten new law reform projects

The Law Commission of England and Wales has published its 14th Programme of Law Reform, introducing ten new projects alongside 17 ongoing ones, following extensive public consultation. Among the new initiatives, the Commission will review the law on consent in criminal law, aiming to resolve longstanding inconsistencies and conceptual uncertainty, particularly in offences against the person and sexual offences, where evolving social attitudes and judicial interpretations have led to unpredictability. The defence of insanity will also be examined, with the Commission seeking to modernise the outdated 1843 legal framework that is misaligned with contemporary psychiatric understanding and terminology, and which has led to underuse and confusion in practice.

Companies must take action as corporate enforcement evolves

Law360, Expert Analysis: At a meeting in late June 2025, Serious Fraud Office (SFO) Director Nick Ephgrave and Matthew Galeotti, head of the criminal division at the US Department of Justice (DOJ), affirmed their commitment to collaborating on high-profile cross-border investigations. Hayley Lund, partner and Frankie Cowl, counsel at Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP discuss the UK's evolving corporate enforcement landscape.

HMCTS publishes blog post announcing acceleration of AI adoption in courts and tribunals

HMCTS has published a blog post announcing plans to accelerate the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) throughout courts and tribunals. HMCTS is developing a comprehensive AI Adoption Plan in line with the Ministry of Justice's AI Action Plan for Justice. Key pilot programs currently underway include AI-powered transcription and summarisation tools, automated judgment anonymisation systems and AI-enabled case management search capabilities. HMCTS emphasises that all AI initiatives will be governed by service-specific responsible AI principles tailored to the unique demands of the justice environment. Additionally, the deployment of AI will be implemented only where it demonstrably adds value and effectively supports human judgment in justice matters.

View Corporate Crime by content type :

News